Time-based Media Art Conservation – A Few Thoughts …

Disclaimer

This post is a little bit off-piste from what I normally cover, but I figured if the ABC can pump out an article on all of the properties owned by politicians in Australia (with much hand-wringing prompted by the Prime Minister buying himself a nice house during a cost of living crisis), then I can write about stuff that isn’t directly related to data centres or my day job.

TL;DR I’ve gotten older and realised that things don’t last forever. A random podcast episode and some dying machinery reminded me of that this week.

 

What is Time-based Media Art?

I recently came across a podcast from The Met called Immaterial: 5,000 Years of Art, One Material at a Time. I follow a few different “retro” technology accounts on the Internet, and someone posted a link to this particular episode. You can find it on Apple Podcasts here. The reason I listened to this one in particular was that it covered some of the challenges associated with time-based media art conservation. So what’s that exactly? To quote the National Gallery of Australia, it’s “works of art that are dependent on time, duration, or function. This includes: video, film and audio artworks that have a duration; installation artworks; and artworks that function only for the duration of their time on display, such as computer-based and mechanical works of art.” In one of the examples used in the Immaterial episode, the artists had used VideoCD as the primary medium for a piece of art based on Starsky and Hutch episodes. I’m as big a fan of Starsky and Hutch as anyone, but I’m probably not qualified to decide whether something like that is art or not. But the point is more that they’ve used a format to display their art that is now, ostensibly, obsolete. Does that mean it still qualifies as the original art piece? At what point does it fundamentally change?

 

Is It a Problem?

The thing that struck me most about podcast episode and subsequent reading I did on the impermanence of various art media was the way we consume art (in galleries and at home) is changing as well. To wit,  one of my MiniDisc recorders had recently stopped working and it was such a strange coincidence and strong reminder of the way our enjoyment of art can be directly impacted by technology progression (or the lack thereof). Fortunately, I have a small, portable unit as a backup, but what happens when that one gives up the ghost? I have boxes of LaserDiscs that I can no longer view because both of my players have stopped working. And countless video tapes in a variety of form factors that can’t be viewed anymore because the playback mechanisms are no longer manufactured and getting people who can fix them is becoming more and more difficult. Thankfully my Zip drive still works but I can tell you that SCSI to USB adapters are pretty hard to find so my Jaz drive is all but useless now. At least in my household. It’s become such a problem in the art world that the Met has put together a “Time-Based Media Working Group” to look into ways of dealing with it. And it’s not just hardware that can impact an artwork’s existence, software can have a big impact on its ability to continue into the future as well. Remember all of those early music services with special encryption that relied on the service being around and contactable over the Internet forever?

 

Is It an Easy Fix?

Not really (and there are plenty of people who know a lot more about this than I do). There are a few different approaches you can take to combat time-based media obsolescence (and I’m thinking more about this in terms of the everyday consumer’s relationship with media rather than media as a piece of art). One approach is to migrate the content from one platform to another. For example, I’ve spent years helping folks progress through various iterations of media lifecycle management by helping them migrate bits and bytes from one storage array to another without losing the data that they treasure so much. From a software / content perspective, some of this is a simple and well understood process, but there are plenty of organisations struggling with moving from one version of critical software to something more modern, particularly when what they had probably worked just fine. And it’s a problem at home too. Thankfully, vinyl records have experienced something of a resurgence, and so there are turntables to be had and the technology is understood and easy enough to procure. I anticipate I’ll be able to play my records for some years to come. The same can’t be said for MiniDisc players, cassette decks (although they’re starting to appear again), and even Blu-ray players and DVD players are becoming harder to come by. Is it the same experience consuming the content on a different format? Does a movie you love from your childhood need to be played back on a video tape? Or is it fine as a digital file on your laptop or consumed via a streaming service? It’s arguably better to watch upgraded versions of content, particularly when it comes to major Hollywood films. Listening to music on cassette sucked, but some of the compressed dross that Spotify serves up is even worse. I have a rack full of Sony Playstation consoles in my home office because I’d rather play the games on the original machines than use emulators. But eventually those consoles will stop working, and then I’ll just be stuck with shelves of dead media after I’ve exhausted my repair options and the secondhand marketplaces. And that can be a tough thing to deal with – the loss of something that you’ve been using for years.  I still have people contact me on this weblog to try and help them resurrect or revive dying EMC CLARiiON and VNX arrays because EMC is no longer interested in helping to keep them alive. Why not just get some cheaper, more efficient storage or put your stuff in the cloud? Is “Every Shot, Every Episode” going to look different if it’s not on Video CD? Not so much, because nowadays it’s running with a different media player and the original Video CD player is purely cosmetic. But there’s something about the particular piece of equipment on display that puts that piece of art in a certain time period. And the same might be said for everyday technology too.

 

Final Thoughts

Can you count on things being around forever? Probably not, particularly when it comes to media playback technology, and particularly when media studios are pushing for more and more content to be controlled by them, rather than existing free in the world for punters to consume as they see fit. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t thousands of people focussed on conserving not only digital art, but also everyday digital items that might otherwise get lost forever. I sometimes think we’re in a better position than ever to conserve media in its original format and be able to do meaningful things with it years after it was useful. At the same time I think there’s a chance that much of the content getting generated this century may not be retrievable in the next one if we’re not more careful with how we store it. If Keeping Up With the Kardashians disappears it’s probably not a bad thing, but I’m sure there’s a lot of art and media out there that is worthy of our attention.

Music – Support Lou Koller If You Can

This is a quick post, and something I don’t normally put on the weblog, but here we are. Lou Koller, lead vocalist of Sick Of It All (by all objective measures the greatest hardcore band to ever exist), has announced he has adenocarcinoma cancer. Which is a fancy way of saying he has a cancerous tumour in his oesophagus. It’s not great, but his bandmates and family have setup a fundraising appeal to help with medical costs. If you have some of the folding stuff available, you can donate to it here. And if you’re in the right part of the world, or happy to pay a little extra for shipping, various bands are also putting out t-shirts with profits going to help Lou. In Australia, Artist First has the NOFX shirt available.

It’s hard to say just how important Lou and SOIA have been to me over the years in terms of having a group of positive punk rock role models, but I have a difficult time imagining a world where Lou isn’t present. I’d seen advertisements in Thrasher magazine when I was in primary school for SOIA albums, but didn’t have the opportunity to hear them until I managed to get hold of a copy of Scratch The Surface when I moved to the big city. The band sounds scary, but is relentlessly upbeat, and has provided a positive influence to thousands and thousands people since they first started playing in 1986. And I’m sure he’ll be able to beat this and get back out there to do what he loves to do. I had the good fortune to get along to see SOIA in Brisbane earlier this year. It had been a few years since I saw them, but they were excellent. Here’s a video of Sick Of It All playing two of my favourite tracks (Scratch The Surface and Step Down) at Area4 Festival 2012. Here’s hoping that Lou beats this and they can get back out on the road soon.

OT: How I Became A Curmudgeonly NBA Fan And Learned To Love It

As this year’s NBA Finals approach, I thought I’d get some thoughts down on some of the things that have started to irk me as a longtime NBA fan. TLDR: if you’re not into the NBA, this article might not be for you. And if you are an NBA fan, you’re probably still better off heading over to The Ringer for in-depth analysis from people who actually know what they’re talking about. I promise I’ll get back to the normal stuff soon, I just needed to get this off my chest.

 

Background

I’m in my early 40s now, and have never played a game of professional basketball. I’ve played amateur basketball for about 25 years. I still play competitively, but I’m “rec league” level at best. Sure, we have uniforms, and there are scorers and referees involved, but it’s not at a level that anyone would willingly watch. Sometimes I apologise to the referees because it’s so ugly. It’s very much pay to play, not the other way around. Like a number of amateurs, I’m a big fan of the professional leagues, and enjoy watching basketball from all over the world. I particularly enjoy watching NBA games. If there’s a game on League Pass, and I have some free time, I’ll invariably watch it. I’m a Lakers lifer, but I’ve happily jumped on the Warriors bandwagon for the last five years (and I’ll be there until at least the LeBron thing is done). But that’s not why I’ve burst into print today.

I’m really just an out of shape couch potato with a lot of opinions that don’t mean anything to anyone. But I’m sharing this with you because I want to know if it’s just me, or are other people feeling this way? There are 15 things here that make me cranky about the NBA fan experience at the moment. Give yourself a score between 1 and 5 for each one and see how you go. I’m coming in pretty hot at 75. And before you get too worked up about some of my hot takes, I’m just having a little fun. And keep in mind that most of this would probably be better debated over a beer rather than the Internet.

 

On Offense

Offensive Shove Off

As you move up the levels in competitive basketball, you’ll start to notice that the defence is a lot more physical. Hand-checking has been a problem for years, but it was heavily curtailed by the NBA in the early 2000s. A lot of the defence played at high levels is man-to-man, and screens are an important part of getting a player free to get off shots. As a result of various rule changes and the NBA’s focus on freedom of movement, players on offence have experienced some improved scoring conditions. But there are still plenty of times where a defensive player is close enough to the offensive player that the offensive player feels the use of a push off is warranted to introduce some separation between themselves and the defender. I can’t help but feel that these shoves are overlooked by the referees more often than not, but like a lot of lazy pundits, I have little empirical data to back that up. It’s usually hard to see when two players are so close to each other, but there have been a few times when I’ve seen a player dribbling the ball with one hand while his other hand is pushing the defensive player out of the way. I’ve played in a few pickup games where players were doing this, and it becomes really hard to stop them from getting to their spot. Did Michael Jordan push off Bryon Russell in Game 6 of the 1998 NBA Finals? I don’t think so, but plenty of people in Utah think he did. It’s so hard to tell. But I’m more perturbed by the more obvious stuff that seems to get missed.

Gathering Steps

The NBA (and basketball associations in general) have been pretty clear about what constitutes a travelling violation for some time, but it feels like the NBA referees don’t call them very often. How many times have you seen LeBron or Giannis take 3 steps to launch for a fan-pleasing dunk? James Harden has taken the use of the gathering step to a whole other level though, and uses it to ridiculous effect on his step back 3-point shots. The Houston Chronicle published an article on why it’s a legal move (of course they did), but I still like to think of it as a travel. Mainly because I have twenty year old referees telling me my jump stop and pivot is a travel. And I’m just generally curmudgeonly when the rules of the game are changed to appeal to the casual fan. But it is worth keeping in mind that the NBA is a bit different to the rest of the world. There’s also a really good video by some NBA referees that attempts to explain the “Euro step” (and travelling in general) that’s worth watching. In the NBA the golden rule is two steps after the gather.

Illegal Screening

A screen is pretty useful thing in basketball that can enable an offensive player to get an advantage by using a team mate to screen off a defensive player. To set a screen, you need to plant both feet and not move any part of your body. So you can’t push your hip out to pick off the defensive player, nor can drop your shoulder into them as they run past you. Yet the number of times players do this in games, and then complain to the referees about the call against them, annoys me no end. Sure, I get that the defensive player can’t run through you to chase their opposing player, but you just need to watch the replay to see that you moved. Just set your feet, or get a grown-up to do it for you.

Chris Paul Flailing

I am a big fan of Chris Paul (the point guard for the Houston Rockets). I love his pass-first mentality and the way he can control the tempo of the game. His mid-range game is really notable (particularly in this era of dunks and 3-point shots), and he will no doubt be inducted into the Basketball Hall of Fame at the appropriate time. But Chris Paul’s on-court shenanigans (including a well-documented habit of flopping) make it hard to watch him for more than a few minutes at a time. As I’ve gotten older (more mature?) I’ve come to understand that you can sometimes trick a referee into thinking that you’ve been fouled by an opposing player. But I think there should be a difference between playing up the contact a little bit and giving an Academy Award worthy performance. At one stage it seemed like the NBA was cracking down on flopping, but we still have this kind of thing going on.

Lane Violations

When you take a free throw in basketball, the rebounders (in the key) can’t move into the lane until the ball has left the hand of the shooter. The players outside shouldn’t cross the three-point line until the ball has hit the rim. And the shooter shouldn’t step across the free-throw line until the ball has entered the basket and the shot has been made. Most of the time, lane violations are called on defensive players looking to block out the offensive players. But there seem to be a lot of shooters actively crossing the line before the ball has entered the basket. Go watch LeBron shoot free throws. He does it a lot, and he crosses that line a lot too.

Carry Ball

Palming is a big problem in the NBA. Watch some of these guys dribble and you’ll see that they let the ball rest in their hands briefly before they continue, and the hand is not allowed to go underneath the ball while touching it during a dribble. That’s a carry, and is usually called as violation in the lower levels of the sport. In the NBA we call it “amazing handles”. It gives the offensive player a significant advantage when they can palm the ball. It’s a big problem in the sport, and it feels like we all just look the other way when it happens.

 

The Clothes Make The Man

Naming

Generational titles (eg Jr, III, etc) seem to have become really popular in the NBA this year. You know who needs a generational title on their jersey? Tim Hardaway Jr. Because I’d buy one of Senior’s jerseys, but probably not one from younger Tim. But for some reason, everyone who’s ever gotten a whiff of one of these is now running with Jr, III, etc on their jersey. Is this a cultural thing in the US? I must admit that I’m ignorant about the significance of it. In any case, it annoys me and I don’t know why. There’s a broader discussion of patronymic naming here that might be interesting too, and sheds some light on the various ways it’s done throughout the world.

Headbands

Why are “ninja headbands” a thing now? This is one of the sure indicators that I’ve become a curmudgeonly NBA fan. Clearly, they solve a different problem to the traditional sweatband. That is, they’re more hair tie than sweat prevention device. But I don’t see why you can’t just use the sweatband. Gracious me, when did I get so old?

Shoes

We’ve come a long way since Nike was paying Michael Jordan’s sneaker fines. In 2015 things started to loosen up significantly, and this season the NBA dispensed with the sneaker policy entirely. That means that, even if your team’s colours are red and black, for example, you can run on the court with some iridescent orange shoes and the NBA will keep quiet about it. I don’t want to be the guy who’s stifling creativity on the court, but I swear it looks more like a C-grade social team put the uniform together, rather than a team of professionals.

Uniforms

I’m the first to admit that the variety of replica uniforms you can buy is great. There are now heaps of ways that you can show off that you’re a fan of this team or that, and it does make a refreshing change from the light or dark thing that dominated the NBA for so long. That said, it used to be accepted that the home team wore a light colour and the away team wore a dark colour. The good thing about this is that you could quickly tell which team was playing at home just with a glance at the television screen. Now I have to take a second look, usually at the floor they’re playing on, to get an idea where they are. Shouldn’t I just know where they are? Why do I care? I don’t know, but it bothers me.

Russell Westbrook As Fashion Icon

Do a search on Google for “russell westbrook fashion” and dig in to the images part of the search. I defy you to show me a picture of him wearing anything that could be described as fashionable. I just don’t get it. And GQ should know better, surely? I don’t blame Russell though, he’s just clearly getting some poor advice (and encouragement) from people who have no idea what they’re talking about.

 

Miscellany

Joel Embiid

Talk as much smack as you want when you’re healthy and competing in the NBA Finals.

Players-Only Commentary

Some players don’t like to stay away from the game when they’re done with playing, so they get into commentary. Usually they’re paired up with a more senior broadcaster to start with. And it’s mostly fine. Some ex-players are better at it than others. There’s been a new development in commentary for NBA games though, with the introduction of “players only” commentary teams in the last few years. Instead of the former player being paired with the professional commentator, you get three guys who’ve played before as the commentary team (and one doing sideline reporting). It’s not that great to listen to, and I think they need to re-think the concept. I love the idea of players offering insights into the game, and people like Jalen Rose do an excellent job of that. But players only really makes me appreciate the skills of people like Mike Breen (Bang!) and Marv Albert (Yes!). Of course, if we switched it up a bit, and insisted on Bill Walton being the anchor on every game call, I might be persuaded to persist with this format. And no, I don’t just want my commentary from old white guys. People like Mark Jackson and Reggie Miller are fine too.

Statistical Near-Misses

Sports commentators love to talk about statistics. And basketball is a pretty good game when it comes to statistics. There are all kinds of statistics that tell you how a player and his or her team have performed. One of the kind of cool statistics is a triple-double. This is where you get double figures in three different statistical areas. Usually it’s points, assists, and rebounds, but sometimes it can be in something defensive like steals or blocks. I’ve been noticing it a lot lately when commentators have been talking about players achieving “near” triple-doubles in games (they might have been short an assist or two, for example). This kind of talk drives me nuts. Let’s talk about great statistics when the player achieves them, not when they almost achieve them. Is this the equivalent of a participation medal for everyone? I know that what the commentator is trying to do is emphasise the great game that the player has had, but surely there are better ways to do it? Like talking about how they helped the team win? the near triple-double sounds like nonsense, and belittles the achievements of those players who were able to achieve “full” triple-doubles in NBA games.

The NBA Store Has Gone Worldwide

The NBA is really good at producing and selling merchandise related to its players, teams and association. Like really good. You want a license plate holder in your favourite team’s colours, or some big flags to wave about, or a replica jersey that looks just like the one Kobe wore in the 2000 Finals? No problem. You used to be able to go to store.nba.com and find all kinds of crap covered with the logo of your favourite team. And the clearance sales were great. Each year our Christmas tree is decorated with quite a few Lakers baubles, for example, and my youngest possesses a number of Warriors shirts and trinkets from the store. But for some reason the NBA decided that if you live outside the US, you now have to use their “International” store. The good thing about this is that the postage is actually reasonable. The prices on items are so-so, but never quite as cheap as the US store, even with currency fluctuations taken into account. The bad thing is that the variety of items is extremely limited compared to the US store (I’ve been comparing via VPN), and they often don’t have stuff in stock, even when it says that it is. I’ve had a number of occasions where I’ve purchased a jersey from the international store only to have them refund my money a week later and tell me the item is out of stock. Okay then Dan, why don’t you just VPN in to the US store and ship stuff to your friend’s house like you used to? Because they block orders using overseas cards. Trust me, I’ve tried. I used to be all “shut up and take my money”, and now I literally can’t give them money. If you live in the US, you likely won’t understand what this feels like, but as a non-US resident this kind of stuff drives me nuts. It’s not quite as bad as our Netflix catalogue having about a tenth of the available titles as the US one, but it’s up there. I understand that companies sometimes want to produce things locally (and sell them for local prices) to protect local businesses. But this shop operates out of Europe. And doesn’t sell what I want. Just give me the choice!

 

Conclusion

I know it sounds like I’m just being mean to the Houston Rockets, but a lot of this stuff is NBA-wide. I understand that the sport has to evolve to retain fans and attract new ones. If you watch NBA games from the 1950s it’s a lot different to what it looks like now. Every decade looks and feels different from a fan’s perspective. I grew up on the NBA in the late eighties and early nineties. I got disenchanted with it in the early 2000s, and came back to it about ten years ago. Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to love about the game as it’s played today. The players are super athletic, the speed of the game is amazing, and the access we have to the League via social media is unparalleled. But there’s some stuff I just don’t like about what I see.

We all struggle with change as we get older, particularly when those changes impact things that bring us joy. I’m clearly at that point in my life now where things have changed and I haven’t kept up with them. Some guys I know still don’t like the idea of the three-point line (it’s a bit flashy and takes away from the passing game). This is just my way of talking about it, getting it out there. There might even be people like you out there who struggle with this too. Maybe we can start a support group or something. In the meantime, bring on the Finals, and go Dubs!

OT – Career Advice

If you’ve ever checked out my LinkedIn profile you’ll know I’m not necessarily a shining light of consistency in terms of the work I do and who I do it for. That said, while I’m not a GreyBeard yet, my sideburns have silvered somewhat and I’m nothing if not opinionated when it comes to giving advice about working in IT (for good and bad). Funnily enough someone I know on the Internet (Neil) was curious about what IT folk had to say about getting into IT and put together a brief article and quotes from myself and 110 other people who know a bit about this stuff. I hate the term “guru”, but there are certainly a bunch of smart folk giving out some great advice here. Check it out when you have a moment.

Faith-based Computing – Just Don’t

I’d like to be very clear up front that this post isn’t intended as a swipe at people with faith. I have faith. Really, it’s a swipe at people who can’t use the tools available to them.

 

The Problem

I get cranky when IT decisions are based on feelings rather than data. As an example, I’ve been talking to someone recently about who has outsourced support of their IT to a third party. However, they’re struggling immensely with their inability to trust someone else looking after their infrastructure. I asked them why it was a problem. They told me they didn’t think the other party could do it as well as they did. I asked for evidence of this assertion. There was none forthcoming. Rather, they just didn’t feel that the other party could do the job.

 

The Data

In IT organisations / operations there’s a lot of data available. You can get uptime statistics, performance statistics, measurements of performance against time allocated for case resolution, all kinds of stuff. And you can get it not only from your internal IT department, but also from your vendors, and across most technology in the stack from the backend to the client-facing endpoint. Everyone’s into data nowadays, and everyone wants to show you theirs. So what I don’t understand is why some people insist on ignoring the data at hand, making decisions based solely on “feelings” rather than the empirical evidence laid out in front of them.

 

What’s Happening?

I call this focus on instinct “faith-based computing”. It’s similar to faith-based medicine. While I’m a believer, I’m also a great advocate of going to my doctor when I’m suffering from an ailment. Pray for my speedy recovery by all means, but don’t stop me from talking to people of science. Faith-based computing is the idea that you can make significant decisions regarding IT based on instinct rather than the data in front of you. I’m not suggesting that in life there aren’t opportunities for instinct to play a bigger part in how you do things rather than scientific data, but IT has technology in the name. Technology is a science, not a pseudo-science like numerology. Sure, I agree there’re a bunch of factors that influence our decision-making, including education, cultural background, shiny things, all kinds of stuff.

 

Conclusion

I come across organisations on a daily basis operating without making good use of the data in front of them. This arguably keeps me in business as a consultant, but doesn’t necessarily make it fun for you. Use the metrics at hand. If you must make a decision based on instinct or non-technical data, at least be sure that you’ve evaluated the available data. Don’t just dismiss things out of hand because you don’t feel like it’s right.

OT – Brief hiatus

This is just a quick note to let my three loyal readers know that I’ll be overseas on holiday for a little while and won’t really be willing or able to blog about much. When I get back in late October I need to look for another job, so if there’s not a lot of content in the next few months I apologise in advance. Incidentally, if anyone’s in London, Paris or Holland in the next 6 weeks let me know and maybe we can catch up.

OT – Top 109 – Thank you

I apologise that I’m a bit behind at the moment, but I’d like to thank those of you who voted for me on the vSphere-land top VMware and virtualisation Blogs thing this year. I came 109th, and it’s the first time I’ve cracked the list. Wheee! Cooler for me was that I scraped into the Top 10 of “Favorite Storage Blog”. You’ve probably noticed I’ve been more focussed on storage things lately, so this makes sense. Thanks to Eric Siebert for putting it all together. Now do yourself a favour and go and check out the other blogs on the list – there’s some really solid content that’s being put out there on a daily basis.